Nov 30, 2008

Seminar I-Group #1

9722601蔡幸瑜 Lynn

9722601 Lynn
9722602陳瑩珍 Jenny

9722602 Jenny
9722604廖欣怡 Crystal PART 1

9722604廖欣怡 Crystal PART 2

9722604 Crystal

Labels:

This entry was posted on Nov 30, 2008 at 13:17 You can skip to the end and leave a response.

8 留言:

Anonymous said...
December 1, 2008 at 12:42 PM  

Lynn
 Good pictures delivery the imformation more deeply.
 Give the anwers below the research questions, we can understand the questions and get the answers immediately.
 The logo of school on the PPT shows the professional prsentation.
 Put the citations after the sentences.
 Defination of terms is necessary for the general topic of lingusitic.

Jenny
 Look so professional in the formal dress and hairstyle.
 Organize the outline clearly.
 Accurent prounication and clear explanations.
 Good examples for introduction, e.g., ‘I’m loving it’ by McDonald show the intangible strategy.
 Analysis the paper in the fields of reliability and validity.
 Defination of terms can make us get ideas in the different fields.
 Too much introduction, but few details about the research procedures and results.
 Citations separate who said the sentences, either the author or others.

Crystal
 Good explanation for the topic, and also the interesting topic catches our eyes.
 Did the good job of the clear chart, especially the comparative between digital video process and writing process.
 Make examples by herself, it’s really an interesting example for us, and we can understand iMovie though the process.
 How to improve students’ writing ability through iMovie is really a challenge for the teacher, and how to evaluate the students’ proformace is also a question.
Leya said...
December 1, 2008 at 11:39 PM  

Jenny
1. Professional PPT
2. Fluent presentation
3. Speed of speaking is a little fast.
Crystal
1. The topic is novel and interesting.
2. While playing the website, it wasted time.
Lynn
1. Clear pronunciation
2. The PPT about the citation is weird.
3. It took too much time on literature review.
Anonymous said...
December 2, 2008 at 6:41 PM  

Jenny:(strength)
Interesting topic attracts me.
Clearly explanation in Q&A.
Perfect pronunciation
(weakness)
Speaking fast when audience didn’t get the ideas.
Crystal:(strength)
Professional PPT design.
Good multimedia aid to arouse audience.
(weakness)
 Topic is good, but not practical: I mean are 10-13years old students really have good enough computer skills enable to structure iMove on websites.
Lynn:(strength)
Prevalent topic, so arouse audience’s interests to know more in the field.
Professional dress up
(weakness)
 The citation is too old.
 Explanation should be
clearer.
Anonymous said...
December 3, 2008 at 10:53 AM  

Jenny
Jenny shows us a very professional, well-organized and resourceful PPT. She has no stage frights in performing her findings with confident and fluent English. Furthermore, thanks to her explicit explanations of terms, we have no confusion and misunderstanding to her presentation. I am impressed on her thoughtfulness and expecting her next presentation.

Crystal
I am fascinated by her concise and precise diagrams which help me to understand the main concept easily. Also, with her innovative but controversial idea of splicing video into the writing process, it not only teaches me that all different kinds of methods are worth to be considered, but also proves the conception of hypothesizing boldly, and seeking for evidence carefully.

Lynn
In the beginning of her presentation, she shows us several pictures of her students which make me realize that the object of her research could be suggested to children’s acquisition of second language. However, it would be better for her to state her own point of view more instead of showing a lot of literature reviews.
Anonymous said...
December 3, 2008 at 4:03 PM  

For Jenny,
Jenny really prepared very well. We could see that from her presentation that she wore professional suit, made formal PPT, fluently English speaking skill, organized present process and always kept smile. If she could speak more slowly, that will be perfect. However, the journal article is such a great work and she presented it briefly in ten minutes, I think she really did a good job.

For Crystal,
She gave us a systematical presentation about the article. We could clearly understand what she wanted to mention and the charts are organized that we could realize the procedure of the writing class. In addition, she got good time control and she let us feel comfortable to take a lesson about a new method to teach writing.. But I have a question about the imovie lesson. In the journal, is there any description about how long an imovie will be suitable in one class?

For Lynn,
Lynn chooses a good article to make everyone more understand a second language acquisition. We enjoyed her presentation and had an interactive discussion. I like her photo of children study and the brief content that we could understand very clear what information she want to tell us. It is a pity that she got something problem about her PPT, but I trust she must prepare very well, maybe there is something wrong with the computer.
Anonymous said...
December 4, 2008 at 2:11 AM  

I am really satisfied with my presentation on Oct. 13th, 2008. It is out of my expectation. I thought I will forget what I am going to say next, but no. Moreover, I think I still can do better. I found my strength are PPT making with the organization, I just revise twice, but I really spent too much time on the design part, and about the dress part, I want to appreciate Lynn and Jenny who told me that they are going to wear like the clerk working in the bank (ha-ha)… Also the example one is my proud part, I have searched for many website and I found this interesting website, and I really arouse my interest and I want to share to you even to your students.

Only the following things that I need to work more in my future research; that is, I need more theory to support my content and the nervousness. I think I need to read more to make my goal more clear, and about my looking nervousness, I think I need to make my gesture more natural, it will make me look more better.
During the meeting with teacher Teresa, she said that I am the first one that already know what I will do in the following two years, I appreciate that I am the first one, but, I know myself. The first one doesn’t mean the best one, I think I need to try more hard and work hard and also study hard in the following two years. Don’t waste time; always keep the words that Caesar said: “I came, I saw, I conquered” (the original words from Latin "VENI VIDI VICI"). The meaning from mine is “face it, take it, over come it.”
In addition, I also do some feedback to my dear classmates, I am a real open-minded person, and I totally welcome your suggestion to me, just do it, don’t hastate!
Anonymous said...
December 7, 2008 at 4:59 PM  

Jenny
Clear PPT, and speak very fluently very detail. But it's a littel bit difficult for me to catch up the speed.

Crystal
Interested topic, a little bit nervous at the end for the presentation (introducing the web site).

Lynn
More smile on your face will be great, too nervous.
Anonymous said...
December 7, 2008 at 8:41 PM  

Jenny
Strength
I. Examples is interesting.
II. The PPT is professional
III. Well organized.
IV. One point at one page.
V. Defined the terms.
Weakness
I. Spend much time on introduction.

Crystal
Strength
I. The topic is interesting.
II. The PPT is clear.
III. The Example is good and attracts me.
Lynn
Strength
I. Page 7&8 is clear.
II. The pictures of her students on PPT are good.

Weakness
I. The page 6, “important questions” is not good.
II. Page 10, the Literature is too old.

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)