Seminar I-Group #3
9722611邱婉菁 Ilisa
9722611 Ilisa
9722612戚禎祐 York
9722612 York
9722613鄭曉薇 Paulinna
9722613 Paulinna
9722614李洁禎 Mark Part 1
9722614李洁禎 Mark Part 2
9722614 Mark
9722615陳漢明 Jeffrey
9722615 Jeffrey
Nov 30, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 留言:
December 1, 2008 at 12:48 PM
Ilisa Clear form for theoretical background, methodology and even the results Some grammar errors
York Good pronunciation
To condense the 20 pages paper into the short and clear PPT Over the presentation time
Paulinna Good pronunciation
Formal dress Some grammar errors
Mark Clear design of PPT A little nervous
Jeffrey Formal dress (nice tie!)
Interesting topic
The design of slight 10 is excellent (Can you teach me? ^^) Some speaking errors
December 1, 2008 at 9:25 PM
Comments from Lynn 蔡幸渝:
ID: 9722601
For Illisa:
Strength:
1. Confidence
2. Theoretical background
3. Well-organized
4. Flow charts
5. Professional PPT
6. Dressed up
7. Reflection
Weakness:
1. Pronunciation errors
2. Not explaining “Coral was in the same situation of her time.”
For York:
Strength:
1. Great pronunciation
2. Great explaining and definitions
3. Be familiar with article
4. Well-organized
5. Professional PPT
Weakness:
You are very great so you didn’t have to take the notes.
For Paulinna:
Strenth:
1. Brief introduction
2. Good explanations
3. Flow charts
4. Professional PPT
5. Good backgrounds: Hong Kong
6. Dressed up
Weakness:
1. Should use Roman letters in your content.
For Mark:
Strength:
1. Clear organization
2. Narrow charts
3. Good applications
4. Reflections
Weakness:
1. Too nervous
2. Not clear Explanations
For Jeffery:
Strength:
1. Interesting topic
2. Brief Introductions
3. Great application to the blog
4. The charts on AIDA model
5. Categorized Collection
6. Professional PPT
7. Dressed up
December 1, 2008 at 10:59 PM
From Jenny 陳瑩珍 9722602
Comments on the presentations on October 27:
Ilisa
A) Strength:
1. Looks good
2. Clear points and tables
3. Easy to understand
4. Provided good examples and explanations
B) Weakness:
1. Some incorrect intonation
2. Grammar errors on PPT
3. Methodology wasn’t quite clear
4. Font of personal information on the cover page was too large
York
A) Strength:
1. Good introduction
2. Abundant examples
3. Appropriate eye-contact
4. Organized PPT
5. Clear explanation
6. Excellent pronunciation
B) Weakness:
1. Can type out what the initials stand for, instead of only explain
2. Inadequate control of time
Paulinna
A) Strength:
1. Relevant PPT background (Hong Kong)
2. Wonderful pronunciation
3. Well organized
B) Weakness:
1. No methodology
2. Some grammar mistakes
3. Outdated article
Mark
A) Strength:
1. Clean PPT background
2. Definition of terms
3. Well-organized PPT
B) Weakness:
1. Lack of fluency
2. Unclear implications and process of the study
Jeffery
A) Strength:
1. Looked very professional! (like a CEO!)
2. Interesting topic
3. Clear and organized PPT
4. Good animation
5. Fluent delivery
6. Excellent examples
B) Weakness:
None.
December 1, 2008 at 11:48 PM
Ilisa
1.Clear introduction of the study
2.Voice is loud enough and clear for listeners
3.The research article itself doesn’t be designed well. So next you can find one research article with visible significance for readers.
York
1.Clear explanation about the study.
2.Speech delivery is proper for listeners
Paulinna
1.You seemed to speak in a hurry. The pace can be slow down.
2.Well- organized contents
Mark
1.Lack of methodology part
2.Clear interpretation of the research
Jeffrey
1.Well-designed PPT.
2.Clear chart of the data analysis
December 2, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Ilisa:Strength:
Good eye contact
Good answers to questions
Good PPT design in slide 15
Weakness:
Not operating PPT well
Explanation should be
more clearly
York:
Strength:
Clearly pronunciation
Good example to explain
Interesting topic
Point out response rate
Weakness:
Improve eye contact
Mark:
Strength:
Good organization
Dress up
Weakness:
Unclearly delivery
Red words are not
clearly on PPT slide.
Paulina:
Strengh:
Good pronunciation
Overall is good
Good topic
Weakness:
Outdate Publication of
the research paper
Jeffery:
Strength:
Professional PPT design
Good introduction of AIDO
model
Good eye contact
Looks good
Weakness:
Pronunciation is good,
but should be louder
December 3, 2008 at 10:56 AM
Ilisa
Strength
1. Eye-contact with audience.
2. Clear explanation of theoretical background.
Weakness
1. Should be familiar with the technology.
2. Presented an out of date quotation on slide six.
York
1. Speak fluently.
2. Explanation is very clear.
3. Familiar with the content of the topic.
Paulina
Strength
1.Full of confidence.
2.Use a clear way to explain the terms.
Weakness:
1. It would be better to present in a proper speed and tone.
Mark
Strength
1. Showed a very helpful and convenient resource.
Weakness
1.Should be well prepared to show the website before his presentation.
2.Vague explanations of terms.
Jeffery 1.Professional PPT design.
2.Well-organized.
3.Get to the point specifically and directly.
December 3, 2008 at 3:47 PM
I really appreciate our dear Teresa because not only she gives us a chance to show ourselves on the stage but also let us understand how to prepare well before you present. That is a positive attitude not only for our further presentation but also for our life.
Frankly speaking, this is a hardworking course that I have never taken. But I will try my best to pass the course.
Before the presentation, I was shocked by the serious attitude of our dear teacher, so I tried very hard to follow her step. I read the article which I wanted to present three weeks ago and then had prepared the power point for several days. After that, I asked teacher for help and teacher pointed out what I had to show on my personal presentation. Finally, I got the key point after three times negotiations. I think that was a great experience for my further dissertation report to do a whole presentation like this.
However, I have to say that I am so depressed after the presentation. Even if I had prepared for a long time before the presentation, I still made several mistakes. First, I didn’t set the microphone well. That must be a BIG mistake before a formal presentation. Second, I didn’t practice my pronunciation perfectly and I think my poor pronunciation will let the audience feel the presentation is informal. Third, I used some words which are not clear, formal, and professional on the PPT. The worst of all, I made a severe grammar mistake on the PPT. That was so terrible that I was shy to face my classmates.
Although I didn’t do very well in this presentation, I have to say that I have tried my best and I was proud of myself. However, there is a long distance that I have to go in the future life
December 4, 2008 at 2:09 AM
Ilisa
strength
Nice dress
With confidence
weakness
More smile would be better
Not familiar with the operation with the computer.
It’s better for you to tell the audience the participant’s background first.
Question
In slide 11 and 12, you mentioned that Eowyn and Coral are from the same background, but why they have the different consequence?
York
strength
Full of confidence
Eye-contact
Well-organized performance
Neat PPT
Good explanation of “Semi constructed interview”
weakness
The note that you hold with you
Question.
In slide 13, it says that most students think traditional activities were still effective to facilitate their English learning. I doubt this. It seems that CLT needs outside classroom activities to help their communicative skills. It is a different view. What is your opinion on this?
Paulina
strength
Fluently speaking
Well-organized content
Nice HK background
weakness
The paper is too old
Question
Because the data is too old, do you really think the consequence is still the same based on the research?
Mark
strength
Professional background of PPT
Nice dress
Good information on this topic, I am benefited
weakness
Waiting to see the internet sources.
Question
In slide 3, it states that the corpus is for academic writing, but in slide 4, the definition on corpus is “…collection of written or spoken texts…” because the topic is for ACDEMIC use, do you think the spoken texts also academic? It is kind of conflict here...
Jeffrey
strength
Very interesting topic
Well-organized presentation
Handsome dress
Good animation
Good website
weakness
Can I say “No”? I was surprised at your performance this time. Good job.
Question
You mentioned that you will set up your own website to do the research and you want to do the questionnaire through your website; therefore, you need a large number of participants. But, are you really sure that you can find over 300 participants? How about if you do not have enough participants? And, it is really hard to make an in-deep interview through website. For me, it is quiet dangerous. So, what is your opinion?
December 4, 2008 at 6:49 PM
Presenter：Ilisa
Advantages:
1)The factors that affect children’s learning, like the arising or declining intonation, is a really helpful way to observe.
2)The idea to let children learn multi-lingual languages in the immersive environment is practical and good for teachers.
Disadvantages:
1)Kind of nervous.
2)The participants in each group seem too few to prove the validity of the study.
Presenter：York
Advantages:
1)Really well presented.
2)The explanation of the semi-structured interview is impressive and helpful.
Disadvantages:
1) How could it be possible to 100% recycle all the questionnaires?
Presenter：Paulinna
Advantages:
1) Good pronunciation.
Disadvantages:
1)The data researched in 1994 seems a little old to reflect the present situation.
Presenter：Mark
Advantages:
1) The idea of corpus is helpful for master’s degree students.
1) The procedure of the presentation could be better organized.
Presenter：Jeffrey
Advantages:
1) Well presentation on the chart statistics.
Disadvantages:
Not found.
December 7, 2008 at 5:10 PM
At first I was very nervous about this presentation; most of the reason is I didn’t know how to organize a PPT. And thanks to teacher Teresa, she really helped me a lot.
PPT is very important in a presentation, because a well-organized PPT can catch the audience’s attentions and can let the speaker speaks more frequently. And the color of the PPT is very important too, because if the color is the dark the audience can not read the PPT clear, and also the APA format is important, this time I used Arabic numeral instead of Roman number, it should used Roman number will be better, I’ll remember to use Roman number next time. And there were some grammar mistakes in my PPT, I should really work on my grammar. Some classmates mentioned that I was speaking a little bit to fast during the speech. Next time I will try to speak slower.
I am not good at reading, so I spent a lot of time on reading this article. It is difficult for me to really understand an article and find out the key point. I think I should really practice my reading skill by the reading journals. And I should really try to find my own study field, and start to read some journal which is related with my topic. Next time I’ll start to prepare the presentation earlier and discuss the topic with the teacher first.
Post a Comment